UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report
LIFETIME BRANDS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 0-19254 | 11-2682486 | ||
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1000 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, New York, 11530
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
| Laurence Winoker | (516) 683-6000 |
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.)
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
| ☑ | Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2016. |
Section 1- Conflict Minerals Disclosure
Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (the “Company” and, unless the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company” shall include its consolidated subsidiaries), evaluated its current products and determined that certain products it manufactures or contracts to manufacture contain tin or gold. Accordingly, the Company files herewith as Exhibit 1.01 its Conflict Minerals Report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2016.
The Report is also available at www.lifetimebrands.com, in the Corporate Governance subsection under Investor Relations.
Item 1.02 Exhibit
See Exhibit 1.01 to this specialized disclosure report, incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2- Exhibits
Item 2.01 Exhibits
Exhibit 1.01- Conflict Minerals Report.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
(Registrant)
| /s/ Laurence Winoker |
| Laurence Winoker |
| Senior Vice President – Finance, Treasurer |
| and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: May 30, 2017 |
Exhibit 1.01
Lifetime Brands, Inc.
Conflict Minerals Report
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
This conflict minerals report for the year ended December 31, 2016 is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Rule”).
Business Overview
Lifetime Brands, Inc. (the “Company” and, unless the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company” shall include its consolidated subsidiaries) designs, sources and sells branded kitchenware, tableware and other products used in the home and markets its products under a number of widely-recognized brand names and trademarks, which are either owned or licensed by the Company, or through retailers’ private labels and their licensed brands. The Company sells its products to retailers (including through their internet websites) and, to a lesser extent, to distributors. The Company also sells a limited selection of its products directly to consumers through its own internet websites.
The Company’s product categories include two categories of products that people use to prepare, serve and consume foods, Kitchenware (kitchen tools and gadgets, cutlery, cutting boards, shears, cookware, bakeware, pantryware and spice racks) and Tableware (dinnerware, stemware, flatware and giftware); and one category, Home Solutions, which comprises other products used in the home (thermal beverageware, food storage products, neoprene travel products and home décor).
Due Diligence
Due Diligence Design
The Company adopted a conflict mineral due diligence program which included establishing a management team to oversee the Company’s compliance with conflict mineral reporting. The management team overseeing the program is led by the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and also includes the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Operations, President of Global Sourcing, General Counsel and a team of subject matter experts from relevant functions such as purchasing and merchandising. The Company’s conflict minerals due diligence program also included the development of a Conflict Minerals Policy Statement and due diligence compliance process to assess the potential for products to contain conflict minerals, the engagement of suppliers, record keeping and escalation procedures. The Company’s due diligence procedures have been designed to be consistent with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas, including the related supplements on gold, tin, tantalum and tungsten (the “OECD Guidance”).
Conflict Minerals Policy Statement
The Company’s Conflict Minerals Policy Statement was provided to the Company’s suppliers. It emphasizes the Company’s commitment to work with manufacturers and suppliers to undertake due diligence with their supply chain to assure that conflict minerals originate only from smelters or refiners who source minerals outside the conflict region as defined in the Rule or regulations thereunder, or mines and smelters or refiners which have been certified by an independent third party as conflict free if sourced from the conflict region. The Company’s Conflict Minerals Policy Statement can be found on the Company’s website, www.lifetimebrands.com, in the Corporate Governance subsection under Investor Relations.
1
Due Diligence Implementation
Sources of Supply
With the exception of the Company’s sterling silver and pewter products, the Company sources almost all of its products from suppliers located outside the United States, primarily in the People’s Republic of China. The Company manufactures its sterling silver and pewter products at a leased facility in San Germán, Puerto Rico and fills containers with spices and assembles spice racks at its owned Winchendon, Massachusetts distribution facility.
Based upon the Company’s assessment, kitchen tools and gadgets, cutlery, shears, stemware, flatware, giftware, tableware, pantryware, food storage and certain home décor products the Company contracts to manufacture have the potential to contain conflict minerals through the use of gold, tin and tin solder. The Company’s silver manufacturing facility was also assessed and it was determined that tin and tin solder are used in certain products. Tin solder is used to join together metal pieces and could be considered necessary for the functionality of these products. For the purposes of the required Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (“RCOI”), the Company focused its inquiry on its direct tin and tin solder suppliers and suppliers contracted to manufacture products the Company believes to have the potential to contain conflict minerals.
Products Contracted to be Manufactured by the Company
The Company identified 214 suppliers contracted to manufacture products with the potential to contain conflict minerals. A survey was sent to each of these suppliers. The survey was developed to facilitate the disclosure and communication of information regarding the supply chain. It included questions regarding the supplier’s conflict minerals policy, the engagement and requirements of its direct suppliers, and details of smelters or refiners and sources of conflict minerals. The survey was designed to be consistent with industry-adopted surveys used in conflict mineral due diligence processes.
The Company received responses from all suppliers surveyed and identified ten suppliers who use tin or a tin alloy and six suppliers who use gold and therefore are within the scope of the RCOI regarding the origin of the conflict mineral in question.
The Company’s suppliers, who use gold, tin or a tin alloy, identified their direct supplier of gold, tin or a tin alloy to be located outside the conflict region; however, they were unable to identify the mines of origin or the refining facilities sourcing the conflict minerals used.
With respect to the other 198 suppliers surveyed by the Company, suppliers represented that no conflict minerals were used in the manufacturing of products supplied to the Company.
The Company has relied on the supplier responses received through the surveys to provide it with information about the source of conflict minerals contained in its products. Each supplier response was certified by a representative of the supplier. All responses received were summarized and provided to the Company’s management team overseeing the due diligence program. Further, the management team assessed the reliability of responses received from the suppliers by requesting supporting documentation and by comparing identified smelters or refiners to publicly available information about such smelters or refiners.
Products contracted to be manufactured by the Company containing gold, tin or a tin alloy are manufactured at facilities located in China, India, Japan, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam. The amount of tin or gold used in products contracted to be manufactured by the Company at these facilities was less than 1% of all materials used.
2
Products Manufactured by the Company
The Company has one direct supplier of pewter (comprised of approximately 90% tin) and two direct suppliers of tin solder.
The Company’s direct suppliers of pewter and tin solder are located in the United States. The Company surveyed these suppliers and received responses which included the supplier’s conflict minerals policy, the terms of engagement and requirements of its direct suppliers, and details of smelters and sources of conflict minerals.
The Company’s direct suppliers of pewter and tin solder identified a total of 38 smelters used in turn by the Company’s direct suppliers. The smelters listed below have all been identified as Conflict Free Smelters by the CFSI:
| Smelter Facility Name | Country of Facility | |
| China Tin Group Co., Ltd. |
China | |
| Cooperativa Metalurgica de Rondônia Ltda. |
Brazil | |
| CV Ayi Jaya |
Indonesia | |
| CV Tiga Sekawan |
Indonesia | |
| CV United Smelting |
Indonesia | |
| CV Venus Inti Perkasa |
Indonesia | |
| EM Vinto |
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) | |
| Fenix Metals |
Poland | |
| Gejiu Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Co., Ltd. |
China | |
| Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC) |
Malaysia | |
| Metallic Resources, Inc. |
United States of American | |
| Metallo Belgium N.V. |
Belguim | |
| Mineração Taboca S.A. |
Brazil | |
| Minsur |
Peru | |
| Operaciones Metalurgical S.A. |
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) | |
| PT Artha Cipta Langgeng |
Indonesia | |
| PT Babel Inti Perkasa |
Indonesia | |
| PT Bangka Prima Tin |
Indonesia | |
| PT Bangka Tin Industry |
Indonesia | |
| PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera |
Indonesia | |
| PT Bukit Timah |
Indonesia | |
| PT DS Jaya Abadi |
Indonesia | |
| PT Eunindo Usaha Mandiri |
Indonesia | |
| PT Inti Stania Prima |
Indonesia | |
| PT Menara Cipta Mulia |
Indonesia | |
| PT Mitra Stania Prima |
Indonesia | |
| PT Prima Timah Utama |
Indonesia | |
| PT Refined Bangka Tin |
Indonesia | |
| PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa |
Indonesia | |
| PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa |
Indonesia |
3
| PT Sukses Inti Makmur |
Indonesia | |
| PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Kundur |
Indonesia | |
| PT Timah (Persero) Tbk Mentok |
Indonesia | |
| PT Tinindo Inter Nusa |
Indonesia | |
| Thaisarco |
Thailand | |
| White Solder Metalurgia e Mineração Ltda. |
Brazil | |
| Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co., Ltd. |
China | |
| Yunnan Tin Company Limited |
China |
Future Due Diligence Measures
Due to the nature of the Company’s supply chain, it is difficult to identify contributing sources upstream from the Company’s direct suppliers. Despite the good-faith RCOI performed during this reporting period, the Company has not been able to identify all mines of origin or all of the refining facilities sourcing the conflict minerals used by each of the suppliers identified through the survey.
Tracing materials back to their mine of origin is complex and an aspect of responsible sourcing. Due diligence efforts will continue to focus on the education of suppliers regarding the Company’s commitment to ensuring the safety, health and protection of people and the environment worldwide. The Company will continue to work with its suppliers to improve the content of survey responses and will continue to include a conflict minerals clause in new or renewed supplier contracts. The clause will require the disclosure of use of conflict minerals and will also require suppliers to complete an annual conflict minerals survey. As the Company develops new products and manufactures or contracts to manufacture these new products, or acquires new subsidiaries, the Company will also perform an upfront assessment of the supply chain to ensure it is compliant with the Company’s Conflict Minerals Policy Statement.
This report can be found on the Company’s website, www.lifetimebrands.com, in the Corporate Governance subsection under Investor Relations.
4